Criteria and Heuristics for Business Process Model Decomposition - Review and Comparative Evaluation
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is generally agreed that large process models should be decomposed into subprocesses in order to enhance understandability and maintainability. Accordingly, a number of process decomposition criteria and heuristics have been proposed in the literature. This paper presents a review of the field revealing distinct classes of criteria and heuristics. The study raises the question of how different decomposition heuristics affect process model understandability and maintainability. To address this question, an experiment is conducted where two different heuristics, one based on breakpoints and the other on data objects, were used to create decompose a flat process model. The results of the experiment show that, although there are minor differences, the heuristics cause very similar results in regards to understandability and maintainability as measured by various process model metrics.
منابع مشابه
University Business Model Framework
The purpose of this study is to provide a framework for the university business model as a solution for universities to cooperate with businesses. The method of the present study is a qualitative case study and the research method of document analysis, focal groups have been used to collect data. In the documentation section, 60 documents related to academic business models were selected and an...
متن کاملCritical Success Factors for Business Intelligence Implementation in an Enterprise Resource Planning System Environment Using DEMATEL: A Case Study at a Cement Manufacture Company in Indonesia
This paper is aimed at evaluating critical success factors in Business Intelligence (BI) implementation in an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) environment. The data analysis method used in this paper is the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Model (DEMATEL). The study has been conducted on a cement manufacturing strategic holding company that has implemented ERP since 2010. This ...
متن کاملEntrepreneurship policy and innovative indicators of industrial companies: Evaluation by MCDM and ANN Methods
The present paper presented a methodology for prioritizing the innovative and entrepreneurial indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), taking into account three individual, organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. This methodology has two main advantages: first, the speed of operation in the accounti...
متن کاملA Comparative Analysis on Sony’s Approach to Problem Solving and Decision-Making
Decision making and problem solving are especially important skills for business and life. As an innovation leading corporate, Sony has gradually lost their superiority in innovation and core competences under more and more intensive competition environment. This report is made to investigate Sony current procedure on its solving problems and making decision, analyze approaches and tools used b...
متن کاملA new evaluation model for selecting a qualified manager by using fuzzy Topsis approach
Considering the contemporary business settings, managers’ role is more than essential to the viability and further development of an organization. Managers should possess such skills in order to effectively cope with the competition. Multiple attributes decision making (MADM) is an approach employed to solve problems involving selection from among a finite number of alternatives. The aim of thi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Business & Information Systems Engineering
دوره 58 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016